




|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, Ian, it was JSM's 200th birthday yesterday. I'm sure he had the R4 in mind when he called himself a Utilitarian.
He was one of the 19C philosophers interested in social engineering. He had a lot to say about a lot of things, particularly governments. (A bit like me really). He thought that only laws should be passed that prevented people doing harm to others, and they should be free to do what they liked otherwise. He called this laissez faire. He wouldn't have been very impressed by today's carry on as he disliked oppressive social control and called it dystopia, the opposite of utopia. I'm happy to say that being interested in R4s makes us one of the proles, a bit like the folk that saved the world yesterday in Dr Who. Don't be a robot and get a Corsa.
__________________
www.cormatin.eu |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
In your response to Martin's email you might suggest one reason for his absence of Bentley Corniches - that is they didn't actually make one. Rolls Royce made a Corniche around then, so if he can put up with the pointy radiator shell that might be his answer.
It took Bentley a further 7 years to realise that the financial benefits of a drophead far exceeded the embarrassment of selling a car with a platform designed in the late '60s and with half of the structure removed. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
If we're being picky we could also say that it wasn't JSM who talked about procuring the greatest happiness for the greatest number it was Jeremy Bentham. He took his ideas from Joseph Priestly, a great chap who came from Leeds like me.
The utilitarian idea was that the ideal state should provide the greatest happiness for the greatest number. So probably giving everyone an R4 would be the answer.
__________________
www.cormatin.eu |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Clementine restores an Aston Martin | malcolm | Clementine's Café | 3 | 26-10-04 07:13 PM |