I always try to keep my rpm low. And I learned today the hard way that you really shouldn't be on neutral when going downhill. I built up too much speed which overheated my brakes. When I wanted to come to a full stop at a stop sign I found my brake pedal to be quite soft and she wasn't breaking like she usually does. I only came to a full stop after the stop sign and I was very lucky that there was no car near me.Putting the car into neutral will save more fuel, but you shouldn't really have to do this to get good fuel economy and doing so takes you out of control somewhat...
Changing gear at lower rpms will be a better fuel saving method to start with.
My '66 SAAB 96 two-stroke also has a freewheel which can be selected, also enabling clutchless gear changing. Most two-stroke cars had this device due to the engine lubrication for the pistons (roller bearing crankshaft) being entirely from the oil/petrol fuel mix. As such, with very long downhill situations using engine braking, there was a risk of the pistons seizing, but with the freewheel engaged the engine would just be idling. It worked well for Erik Carlssohn with his RAC and Monte Carlo rally successes, but his nickname was 'on the roof' as he would frequently roll the car! Not for the faint-hearted.....May I interject a note of caution here? Allowing a car to "coast" in neutral of anything other than a short length of time in between gear changes is unsafe and may be dangerous. Under British Road Traffic laws this may lead to a charge of careless driving or possibly driving without due car and and attention (other countries' laws may differ). In any case, the amount of fuel saved would be microscopic. Good driving technique is to have the car "under load", particularly when cornering; in other words, a car should be "driven" round a corner, not coasted and certainly braked on one! Renault 4s have VERY soft, long travel suspension and allowing a 4 to "glide" round a corner at speed might make its handling differ from what the driver is used to-it would probably understeer less-and therefore may catch him (or her) unawares!
: Many years ago I drove an east German manufactured "Wartburg", which had a 2-stroke engine, and a free-wheel. This meant that you WERE coasting whenever you took your foot off the throttle.....it took a great deal of getting used to.....
That's a fantastic looking car!My '66 SAAB 96 two-stroke also has a freewheel which can be selected, also enabling clutchless gear changing. Most two-stroke cars had this device due to the engine lubrication for the pistons (roller bearing crankshaft) being entirely from the oil/petrol fuel mix. As such, with very long downhill situations using engine braking, there was a risk of the pistons seizing, but with the freewheel engaged the engine would just be idling. It worked well for Erik Carlssohn with his RAC and Monte Carlo rally successes, but his nickname was 'on the roof' as he would frequently roll the car! Not for the faint-hearted.....View attachment 26825 :
My brother and I had 'out car' entertainment. We would open the rear windows in the Travellier and climb out so our backsides were sitting on the bottom rail, our legs inside the car, and the rest out in the breeze as the car bowled along country lanes. Happy days!Those were the days!, remember my dads rotten PA Cresta, brilliant things even if tarnished as a toddler, that had a silent fifth too!, (or spacecraft mode), the in car entertainment if sitting in the front ( don’t tell your mother) was watching the road surface through the gaping hole in the passenger footwell, Sooo much better than watching Blue Peter on the box, colour too. Mot’s and seatbelts, things of the future.
Nowadays cars turn themselves off at the lights if you stop long enough, wonder when their brains are going to advance enough to slow you down to a safe stop if you tried such a grave mistake as a bit of ‘freewheeling’ ( seem to remember a song or album of that name)